The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. CitiCat 16:11, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CyberExtension[edit]

CyberExtension (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Protested Speedy, recreated. I've decided to go for extra opinions on this instead of Speedying a third time. I Speedied this twice as G11, advertising. But it's also got no assertion of notability, let alone any sourcing to verify any notability. TexasAndroid 19:08, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


The article is similar in structure and scope to these others found on the Virtual Learning Environment Page:

WebCT and Desire2Learn are also commercial based LMS's and similar to this page on the CyberExtension. Should these other pages be removed as well? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Varezzi (talkcontribs)

  • Keep, tentatively. I may reconsider if a reasonable notability criterion for VLE is presented, and this one is shown to fail that criterion. Digwuren 20:31, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This comment seems confusing to me. What do you mean a "notability criterion for VLE"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.245.63.110 (talkcontribs)
I have added citations on the CyberExtension page to sources that meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. I would request that you review the posting again and reconsider your Delete request. Dmeglio(talk)
Changed to Keep -- notability now established. --A. B. (talk) 19:40, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.