The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 07:04, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Page consists of 1) a vague and POV paragraph that doesn't contain any useful or relevant information, 2) a list of arbitrarily selected historical figures considered important, together with a possible copyvio from VH1 of dubious importance and notability. why should we be especially interested in VH1's opinions, as opposed to any other source? I can see no way this article can be usefully rewritten, page should be deleted as inherent POV and a redirect created to another page which probably covers what this article is trying to get at in a more sustainable way (please suggest) Jdcooper 09:32, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]