The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 21:17, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Crexendo[edit]

Crexendo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This "article" is hopeless, weak, references, no intro, and seems to be a rough draft in hopes it being kept. Ebbedlila (talk) 20:19, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source eval:
BEFORE showed more promo and primary, nothing that meets IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk  01:07, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.