The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 07:50, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Credit Card Roulette[edit]

Credit Card Roulette (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)

This looks like something made up in school one day, particularly with the line "The game of Credit Card Roulette is believed to have been created during the late 1980s by a group of students at Boston College." It also appears to violate WP:NEO, and hence also WP:OR. If all those fail to convince, then remember that Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Crocodile Punter 10:23, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, a blog is not a reliable source, let alone the notability standard of multiple non-trivial reliable sources. Seraphimblade 11:31, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, WP:NEO. --Davidbober 18:59, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as both above. Springnuts 22:41, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as above. 2005 00:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep — the entry is both plausible and interesting Vranak
  • WP:ILIKEIT is not a keep criterion. Seraphimblade 21:04, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Alright then, it's just plausible. Keep. Vranak

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.