The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  08:46, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Credera[edit]

Credera (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entire article shows bold signs at company-initiated advertising and that alone violates our essential and non-negotiable policies because the information and sources here also violate this policy by only being published and republished business announcements, listings and mentions; as always, these subjects have no automatic inherited notability from anything or anyone, and there's nothing else convincing here. Originally PRODed with concerns by Reddogsix. SwisterTwister talk 22:22, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - NN organization lacking in-depth, significant coverage. The claim to notability is being a great place to work. Falls under WP:1EVENT. The coverage are listings and the article lacks in-depth references. reddogsix (talk) 00:40, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 February 3. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:09, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 21:16, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.