The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 07:45, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Coruans[edit]

Coruans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Generally messy and incomplete, unedited for 12 days. And if it were in a finished form, I still don't think the content is appropriate because the list is an arbitrary intersection. No sources. MER-C 09:26, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I looked over the article three times and I still have absolutely no idea what the hell I was reading. The article provides no context and consists solely of a messed up template. Pablo Talk | Contributions 10:01, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Reminds me of an article I read once in a music magazine where they translated the lyrics from the Japanese releases of various Western CDs back into English with much hilarity ensuing. Having said that I can see absolutely no point to this article whatsoever, so delete ChrisTheDude 10:32, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Made up acronym for something that may have a real term associated with it. Might be a good linguistics (is that the right field?) article (if it's not original research) with some work in userspace, though possibly just trivia. Katr67 21:03, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.