The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW. Closing per unanimous consensus. — Aitias // discussion 00:20, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Corporal burns park[edit]

Corporal burns park (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable playground. There doesn't appear to be a speedy deletion criterion for places. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 20:06, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I cant see any reason why this would pass WP:N, Its extremely short and there is no reliable references provided. The user who created the page is very new and probably doesnt understand WP:N yet. Harlem675 20:20, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (or merge with Cambridge, Massachusetts). No reliable sources, no apparent notability; I can't even prefer the merge to deletion since this seems so non-notable. Accounting4Taste:talk 20:18, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable playground. Pity there isn't a speedy for this. Blueboy96 20:42, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete — per nom.  Dspradau → talk  16:27, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:12, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Every city of any size has several playgrounds; often they're no more than a patch of scraggly green little bigger than a house lot. They're all named after SOMEone. While there are numerous sources, they all fail of being significantly about the park - the overwhelming number of them are news notes and calendar entries mentioning the park as a location for an event or Parks & Rec lists of every park and playground in Cambridge - and so fail WP:V.  Ravenswing  21:29, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.