The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Star Mississippi 22:01, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cornerstone (charity)

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage to meet WP:ORG. Article relies on primary sources except for the obituary article on the organisation's founder. LibStar (talk) 23:02, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disability, Organizations, and Scotland. Shellwood (talk) 23:23, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There is some coverage of the charity here, here, here, and here. It may be enough to be notable, not sure if it passes WP:AUD though --Tristario (talk) 00:07, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. WP:GNG is met based on the Scotsman and Press and Journal articles identified by Tristario. Both of these are functionally national-level coverage in Scotland. I also found UK national coverage in the Telegraph here (a few paragraphs and prominent photo coverage). Thparkth (talk) 14:57, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Based on the comments above from Thparkth and the sourcing I'm now satisfied that it meets WP:GNG and WP:AUD --Tristario (talk) 01:29, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.