The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. Whilst there is clearly no consensus to delete, those opining keep largely failed to give reasons based on policy & guidelines why it should be kept. A merge of course, is an editorial matter and can be discussed/carried out in the usual manner. (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 21:52, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Corndogorama[edit]

Corndogorama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Rather spammy write up of a local festival in Atlanta. Created by an SPA. Is it notable? — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 16:23, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- I'm going to go with Keep on this one. I cut the article back to a stub (waaayyy too many shoutouts). Hopefully it can be salvaged from here. - Richfife (talk) 16:31, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to keep my original article. How do I do that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrbutler06 (talkcontribs) 02:52, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If it's for personal use, it's still in the history here. If the AFD results in a delete (which I personally doubt, but you never know), that link will go dead. - Richfife (talk) 03:54, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution has an article on it at their accessatlanta.com site. Article could do with a clean-up, I'll go poke at it a bit. --tiny plastic Grey Knight 13:31, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm cool with that as well. - Richfife (talk) 16:01, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.