- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 02:05, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Coreeda[edit]
- Coreeda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG on every level. Most of the citations fail verification. Prod was contested with reasoning that significant coverage exists in books, good faith search found that is not the case. Spagooder (talk) 05:12, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:52, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm not seeing significant independent coverage to show WP notability. The art isn't even mentioned in a number of the sources. There are links to organizations with ties to the art, a single mention in an article about a wrestler who once studied coreeda, links to blogs and the Coreeda Association of Australia, and a link to a self-published book--but no reliably sourced significant independent coverage of the actual art. Papaursa (talk) 00:01, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.