The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 23:54, 7 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Construction Mod[edit]

Construction Mod (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Contested PROD. Restating from the PROD, non-notable gaming mod with no verifiable, third-party sources to show forth to prove any notability. Article also seems to contain nothing but original research, so this also fails What Wikipedia is not. MuZemike (talk) 21:10, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MuZemike (talk) 21:11, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete per nom. nn mod. This article doesn't even attempt to establish notability. Resolute 21:29, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete as non-notable and non-verifiable Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:18, 4 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete - non-verifiable; no evidence of notability. Bart133 ^{t c @ How's my driving?} 21:02, 7 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.