The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Shimeru 04:42, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like advertisement, notablity is not asserted. Was speedy deleted a few times per G11 but never seen an AFD. Alex Bakharev 10:32, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Alex, what do you mean by "notability is not inserted"? I have included references from other sources which indicates some reliability of the article. Can you please advice? Nasha24 13:23, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article is also improved and is more towards encyclopedic form. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nzz (talk • contribs)
Speedy delete - this doesn't need an afd to determine whether it's spam or not. Just salt it already. MER-C 13:18, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Blatant spam which keeps regenerating. --Bongwarrior 17:40, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and SALTWP:CSD #11 definatly applies. It's a no-brainer specially if it keeps being re-created. Thewinchester(talk) 05:18, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy When I speedied this, I was the fifth to do so - it's just spam. jimfbleak 12:22, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.