The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Tony Fox (arf!) 18:21, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Coalition of White Americans[edit]

Coalition of White Americans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Article about an unremarkable organization that is somewhat borderline for a speedy. Username of article creator is first initial and last name of one of the founders mentioned. MobileSnail 16:54, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete, non notable organization. WuhWuzDat 16:57, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete. No claims to notability. I don't even want to Google for notability here at the library. Hairhorn (talk) 17:00, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete "The group hopes to make an impact first within its own community and eventually throughout the United States." They have to do that first. (Off topic: They would have a better chance with a different name.)Northwestgnome (talk) 17:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete:Per WP:A7--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 17:03, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:54, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:55, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete Definitely not notable. Triplestop x3 18:20, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.