The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedied G11 by User:Deb. Bearcat (talk) 18:40, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clive Conway Productions[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced article about a theatrical production company with a dubious claim to meeting WP:CORP — as written, in fact, it's dancing perilously close to being an advertisement ("The formula blazed a trail that has since been followed...") rather than an encyclopedia article — although not blatant enough to trigger my speedy reflex. Delete unless the article can be properly sourced to real reliable sources. Bearcat (talk) 23:44, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not wasting time on this. I already speedied it once and gave the creator a warning. Will repeat that exercise. Deb (talk) 11:59, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.