The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 23:59, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clinton Houses[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nomination on behalf of IP 98.248.32.44 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), who completed steps 1 and 3 of the AfD process and left the following note on the talk page: "Fails notability criteria - has not received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. 98.248.32.44 (talk) 22:32, 18 January 2010 (UTC)"[reply]

I am neutral and only listing this in good faith on behalf of the IP user who followed the instructions in the ((afd1)) template. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 22:44, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep.

Discuses elevator problems in Clinton Houses
Details a family's life in Clinton Houses
Emporis link on page
It's a housing project that houses 1823 people. How many obscure towns have articles on here with less or no media coverage and less residents? mynameinc (t|c) 22:42, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep - not just a housing complex, but virtually a whole neighborhood several large blocks in size, with almost 2,000 residents. Plenty of good sources have been found and can be found. Notable also because of Robert Moses' efforts to build this by knocking down a "slum". Will continue to be notable because of the Second Avenue Subway stops being built nearby. Bearian (talk) 22:25, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep More than enough inline citations, plenty of opportunity for expansion. --DThomsen8 (talk) 14:45, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Of the five references, three are published the owner of the topic (New York City Housing Authority), one is a user-edited site[1][2], and one doesn't mention Clinton Houses at all.[3] 98.248.41.72 (talk) 01:13, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are sources more on Google News that mention it directly, and the CB11M source is to prove it is in Spanish Harlem. Also, I couldn't find a way to edit the Clinton Houses article on Emporis. I am on WikiBreak for a few days and will implement the changes when I get back. mynameinc (t|c) 03:00, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Google news search shows plenty of mention of them. Doesn't the mention in the New York Times in several places, make these houses notable? [4] Dream Focus 18:48, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are plenty of WP:Reliable Sources to back up this article. - FaceMash (talk) 15:26, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Evidently notable. I have added a citation. Colonel Warden (talk) 20:18, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.