The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:56, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ClickDealer[edit]

ClickDealer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:CORP SmartSE (talk) 23:28, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Opppse Keep- I don't know how it does not meet WP:CORP, as the nominator has not explained it. However, the article does meet WP:GNG, which states, "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list." The article meets these requirements Wikipedia guidelines clearly override project guidelines. - BilCat (talk) 23:42, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@BilCat: Despite superficial appearances, there is only one reliable source cited in the article and that doesn't even mention the company! Others are press releases/rehashes [1] [2] or so obscure [3] that they're of no use for demonstrating notability. Which did you think were enough to meet GNG? SmartSE (talk) 23:59, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Also be aware that the criteria for references to establish notability are clear that the interpretation of "independent of the subject" means that the references must be intellectually independent and not rely directly on company-produced information/announcements/etc. This includes interviews/quotations from company sources. None of the references provided meet the criteria.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:17, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:17, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:17, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• BilCat What is an opppse? Seafox289 (talk) 04:43, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete after a quick run through the sources, delete as per nom. SportingFlyer talk 05:09, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; significant RS coverage not found. Just an ad placement masquerading as an article; "...won the Publishers’ Choice of Network or Platform nomination at the European Performance Marketing Awards 2016" says it all. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:10, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete References fail the criteria for establishing notability and fail WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:25, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not much is available online to determine general notability. Mia Watson (talk) 16:26, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.