The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Most-likely made up in school one day, unverifiable, and per consensus below. Malinaccier (talk) 00:38, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Claritism[edit]

New spiritual movement. Non-notable by its own admission and quite possibly made up. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 11:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Most likely something that got made up one day; gets absolutely nothing of use on Google. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 12:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not notable. By its own admission, it is little-known and thus showing it is notable at this point in time will be extremely difficult, if not impossible. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 12:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable or made up in school one day. BonesBrigade 13:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The second paragraph almost explicitly states that it was made up in school one day. -FrankTobia (talk) 14:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:MADEUP. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 14:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete second paragraph gives it away, it's a WP:NFT case. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:00, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete, self-admitted soapboxing of something made up one day. Jfire (talk) 15:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete religioncruft. JuJube (talk) 16:10, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.