- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:00, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- CipherShed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-Notable software. Project did not have any release post the preview release Project has been apparently abandoned since 2016 Hagennos (talk) 17:22, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CThomas3 (talk) 19:43, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:GNG. cnzx (talk) 20:25, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable Dbsseven (talk) 22:02, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Appears to fail WP:GNG -- I could not find significant coverage in reliable sources. The ONLY independent source that appears reliable that provides some coverage of the subject I could find: link. Coverage from PC Magazine but appears to just be a listing written by the developer (?), not independent coverage. Even though the project appears to have been abandoned, if significant coverage in reliable sources can be found I have no problem keeping this article (notability is not temporary). Jujutacular (talk) 14:57, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.