The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 21:59, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cinsay Inc.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Written like a company profile. No notability. Not even a public company. Articles references are written in a manner with close association with the company. Article should be deleted. Light21 19:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:04, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:04, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete blatantly promotional, bad sourcing - David Gerard (talk) 16:10, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete References are mostly primary sources. Google search fails to find independent coverage in RS, mostly press releases and basic directory type info. Nothing to establish notability. MB 17:21, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:PROMO; obvious "corporate spam": History, Clients, etc. Wikipedia is not a WP:WEBHOST for promotional materials. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:45, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Very run of the mill company lacking widespread coverage. The lede is so poorly written that I'm not even sure what this company does. Bearian (talk) 15:45, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - same reason as K.e.coffman AlphaBetaGamma^{DeltaEpsilonZeta} 12:52, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.