The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. clear consensus DGG ( talk ) 00:36, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cinnzeo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article doesn't have any sources, and reads more like an advertisement than anything. Doesn't meet GNG. –Miles Edgeworth^Talk 00:14, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as blatant advertising with no independent sources provided, for a "totally Canadian company" which has the majority of its stores in Saudi Arabia. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:50, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it's a chain Though not sure how big?), seems like it could be notable with enough sources, but they certainly haven't been included. Ran a quick Google search and didn't seem very little substantive RS, so this does come across as promotional.Deathlibrarian (talk) 02:21, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have removed advertising content from the article. Cricketer993 (talk) 06:13, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:55, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:55, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article that has had repeated bouts of promotional content addition by WP:SPAs but still lacks references after more than a decade. My searches are finding routine franchising announcements but not the substantial coverage required for WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 06:55, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:42, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alberta-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:42, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per above, lacks sources and is unlikely to produce more.--SamHolt6 (talk) 04:29, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.