The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep as obviously notable public broadcast company. Bearian (talk) 17:26, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cincinnati Public Radio Inc. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Reads like an advertisement--information in articles can easily be split between WGUC and WVXU. Blueboy96 18:51, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions. -- Gavin Collins 11:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, at least for now. The article needs a rewrite to focus on the organization. The station information belongs in the articles on the stations. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:29, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The claim that they have roughly 140,000 listeners asserts notability. RFerreira (talk) 22:49, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The question for me is "what's in the article that can't be discussed in the station articles?" Not much that I can tell. Blueboy96 13:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Placebo Effect (talk) 17:21, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.