The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ARticle was deleted by User:Bearcat--JForget 01:12, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Wingate[edit]

Christopher Wingate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Unsourced but detailed account of a legal dispute by a party to that dispute. Much the same text was added to several other articles by the same author but has been removed. There has been some media coverage of the events. Because it deals with a legal dispute, this article would have to meet a very high standard of referencing before it could be kept. It is also not really a biographical article, so a change of title would also be necessary. gadfium 18:35, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletions. —gadfium 18:42, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete: Especially after this (editor removed all POV and unreferenced statements). Now, no context. - Rjd0060 22:14, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - original article was using wiki as a soapbox, and after removal of POV, there is no article left. -- Whpq 23:53, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, and the next one to look at at least for POV is Arklow vs. MacLean. DGG (talk) 06:44, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - As per above. I've added a prod on Arklow vs. MacLean since it might be important, maybe - SimonLyall 09:10, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The only thing that might be significant is mentioned in passing, and without any references. jonathon 17:37, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Prior to deletion of content it was entirely a self-interest piece with little or no scope for useful encyclopaedic expansion. Dick G 06:13, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per A1: Little or no content, tagged thusly. J-ſtan^Talk_Contribs 18:24, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.