The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I'll assume that Bearian forgot to strike his first !vote so no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:48, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Christine M. Rose[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanispamcruftisement by Marlaoryx (talk · contribs). Does not meet WP:CREATIVE. bender235 (talk) 20:29, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:51, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - not completely spam, but spam-like. There are several sources, but none are truly reliable. She has won a non-notable award. Bearian (talk) 20:58, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Regards, MacMed^talk _stalk 18:02, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep -- if she was the GoH at a con, even a non-notable one, that would seem to indicate a degree of notability. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:40, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:43, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - big enough, under the Grey nom de plume, to be a biggie in steampunk circles. Bearian (talk) 03:28, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.