- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Christ the King Church (Trumbull, Connecticut)
[edit]
- Christ the King Church (Trumbull, Connecticut) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to meet relevant notability standards; run-of-the-mill parish church, no significant coverage I could find. — Moriwen (talk) 00:36, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Christianity. — Moriwen (talk) 00:36, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 02:33, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 02:34, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. As a litmus test, I checked the local rag, which returned few results beyond obituaries detailing funeral services. I found an article on the diocesan website, but in a few minutes' Google search, that was sadly about it. The article attributes the church to architect J. Gerald Phelan; that attribution returns no results on Google. As a WP:ATD, I would not be opposed to a redirect to Trumbull, Connecticut#Places of worship, where the church is curiously not listed, but could justify a sentence or two. IgnatiusofLondon (talk) 14:13, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:58, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:08, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.