The result was delete. Kevin (talk) 21:49, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Autobiographical Lawrence Ryan (talk) 14:55, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Peacock Terms: Since the author is the subject of the wiki, they propped up any successes that they may have (debatable) achieved.
2. The neutrality is disputed because it is autobiographical. The author only represents the positive accomplishments he felt that he made, while ignoring all of the negatives that he was involved in at the same time. He was a politician, and each and every politician overlooks all of the negative acts they committed in favor of the positive acts.
3. His notability is in question. He served one 3-year term as a municipal city councillor. Is this sufficient to be notable and included in an encyclopedia? If so, then there ought to be millions of pages on wikipedia for all of the insignificant city councillors that ever served.
4. It is certainly a biased viewpoint because the subject of the the wiki was the author himself. Lawrence Ryan (talk) 18:31, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]