The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Shereth 03:45, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chili cheese burrito[edit]

Chili cheese burrito (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Article about an action to get Chili Cheese Burritos back to Taco Bell [1], a joke about a comedian that it is Mexican slang for penis, and a 'reverse engineered' recipe [2]. This leans towards nonsense and advertisement, and is in any case unnotable. I prodded it yesterday giving the same reason, but as the creator contested (see talk page of the user and the article), the prod was removed, so here I am. Cheers, Face 07:15, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete wikipedia is not one of those things you stand on to shout your opinion at passers-by. Jasynnash2 (talk) 08:52, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, no indication of notability, insufficient sources for verifiability, inappropriate subject for an article. Huon (talk) 09:28, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• weak keep Too much POV, but it does look like there is a certain amount of notability to warrant an article. The www.Chilicheese.org page lists news coverage such as Philidelphia Weekly, and on a nationally syndicated radio show [3] (although I have been unable to listen to that Mindows Media file). StephenBuxton (talk) 11:49, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Pure OR rubbish. L0b0t (talk) 13:08, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you do a Google search, you'll find quite some forum/blog posts about it, and as Stephen showed, an RS even mentioned it. The article might be rubbish yes, but it's not OR. Cheers, Face 13:43, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:N. Huon is right. It is an inappropriate subject for an article. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 14:03, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Aside from the POV problem, I think I see a WP:COATRACK. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 17:28, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete ridiculous. JuJube (talk) 18:58, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong delete fails just about everything, CB ukexpat (talk) 20:10, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.