The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 23:51, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Charlotte Chambers[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of an architect, relying exclusively on primary sources for referencing with no evidence of reliable source coverage to make her a notable architect. Delete unless the sourcing and notability claim can be suitably beefed up. Bearcat (talk) 23:34, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The student scholarship does not provde encyclopaedic notability and I can find nothing better. Fails all WP:BIO criteria. AllyD (talk) 06:32, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The references don't support the subject as notable Wayne Jayes (talk) 13:37, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. --Jersey92 (talk) 18:40, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete winners of scholarships are virtually never notable for that alone.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:26, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.