The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 03:58, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Scriven[edit]

Charles Scriven (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no indication of meeting guidelines at WP:PROF. References given are not significant coverage. noq (talk) 01:12, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Tom Morris (talk) 07:55, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article should be kept because Scriven is the President of a significant accredited college and also the Chair of a quite influential Adventist non-profit. Surely Presidents of colleges are significant enough to be written about? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eraoihp (talkcontribs) 16:23, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 23:32, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.