The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. —dgiestc 16:52, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fails criteria for notability per WP:MUSIC. No recordings, tours or awards listed. No significant independent third party coverage. Nv8200ptalk 18:55, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Vanity listing to get traffic to their myspace page. Pharmboy (talk) 19:38, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Seems to be above a garage band, but not quite in the realms of notability. There may be some Italian language sources, but I don't speak it. J Milburn (talk) 20:20, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Merge. Seems to meet two of the criteria for being notable: 1) Released three albums on Holy Records, a fairly well known label with notable artists such as Elend, Orphaned Land, and Septic Flesh. 2) Consists mainly of members from a notable band (Septic Flesh). On the other hand, I've never seen Chaostar mentioned as anything but 'a Septic Flesh side project'. So maybe merging and redirecting is the best way to go. The Legend of Julie Egbert (talk) 10:29, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with ((refimprove)) in place. Legend of J.E. is correct in citing WP:BAND#Criteria for musicians and ensembles in that this group satisfies multiple criteria ... but it needs reliable sources to verify the assertions that make this decision possible. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 04:09, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Merge. As per Legend of J.E. this seems notable enough for inclusion. Unlike a vanity page, this article was created by a respected user Xxhopingtearsxx with many main space edits. However, the article lacks adequate sources and there are no permanent members of this group that are currently notable enough to warrant their own articles. Assuming this page survives the current AfD it will need serious attention. --S.dedalus (talk) 01:46, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.