The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Not notable without sources, and as it is WP:NOTDICDEF. Malinaccier (talk) 03:09, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chaos Merchant[edit]

Other than a very brief mention in "Scientology Fiction" in The Washington Post, could not find significant discussion of this article's topic in secondary WP:V/WP:RS sources. Also, WP:NOTDICDEF. Cirt (talk) 23:10, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom. It's an interesting topic, and I actually rather like the idea of researching those who profit from chaos. But it's not encyclopedic. --Good Damon 23:18, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article's topic is just some term used by L. Ron Hubbard. That's not enough to make it notable. The Washington Post article doesn't make it notable. Bart133 ^{(t) (c)} 00:06, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~Comment: send it over to Wiktionary. Not enough to information to warrant an encyclopedia article.~~ DigitalC (talk) 00:47, 21 June 2008 (UTC) [changed my mind] - If reliable source is found that says it is the same as an SP, then Merge and redirect. DigitalC (talk) 23:46, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Suppressive Person. Scientology's own dictionaries say the two are identical, this term apparently being older. WillOakland (talk) 21:10, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is another obscure Hubbardism that L. Ron used to label people who he did not like. --Fahrenheit451 (talk) 23:32, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.