The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:05, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chandradhoja Paramahansa Dev[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet notability guidelines albeit WP:GNG or WP:BIO. Infact, the proper spelling of this individual's name is Chandradhoja Paramhansa Dev, not Chandradhoja Paramahansa Dev. Davidbuddy9Talk 07:06, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:07, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Speedy?) delete as there is no evidence that this astrologer/spiritual guru passes WP:GNG, nor is an assertion of importance made in the article. I couldn't find the name of this person mentioned in any of the books cited as references (which are not even WP:RS) to the article. I also think that the author of this article has some misunderstandings about the right terminology that should be used to describe the subject, e.g., he dabbled in pseudoscience like astrology, and not actual sciences like astrophysics and cosmology. — Stringy Acid (talk) 09:54, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.