The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:24, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete The user that created the article has only contributed to the band and band member article that was redirected to this page. After doing a google search, everything on the band is self promotion and minor reviews and no mainstream interviews with music magazines though there are a few online interviews and small independents. Notability is weak. BioDetective2508 (talk) 04:59, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Self-promotion for a self-funded, self-marketed album supposedly due out in 2010. There are millions of non-notable bands in the world that do not merit a wikipedia entry, and this is just another one of them. Parkerparked (talk) 12:03, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Article does not lack for words, but it does for sources--and the subject lacks notability. Drmies (talk) 17:40, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, self-promotion for a [so far] non-notable band.--Cannibaloki 18:16, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.