The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. JERRY ^talk _contribs 04:50, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Celebreality[edit]

Lack of notability Nightscream (talk) 04:34, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The term "Celebreality" is nothing more than the name that VH1 gives to its reality show lineup. There is no encyclopedic information on this topic that could fill up a proper article, which is illustrated by the fact that the bulk of info currently in the article is devoted to the individual shows that are part of the lineup (which already have their own articles). Even the passage that establishes the coining of the phrase is a Toronto Star article from 1991 (long before the current reality show boom that began in 2000), and that article isn't even about reality television shows, but a completely unrelated observation about celebrities who choose unassuming, non-ostentatious looks at award shows. Nightscream (talk) 04:34, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Needs references If indeed this is a new cultural term then it should be floating around more. If more sources can be sited it deserves to stay. If not it should go.Georgiamonet (talk) 04:55, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete per the nom's reasons.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 18:53, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable neologism. --Orange Mike | Talk 02:20, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.