The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:24, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This looks more like something that should be on Urban Dictionary. Article notes its own lack of notability - I can't even justify a transwiki to wiktionary. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 20:50, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is practically the definition of a protologism. We don't want it, and, as Dennisthe2 notes, Wiktionary wouldn't want it either. Zetawoof(ζ) 22:50, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Anyone can make up a word, and people in advertising are especially talented at this, but that doesn't make it worth an article in WP.Northwestgnome (talk) 23:13, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.