The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:50, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Caucasianity[edit]

Caucasianity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not for publicising your end of university MA Show. There is a dearth of reliable sources [1] Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:01, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. AutomaticStrikeout 16:24, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - The article appears to be heavily supported by UrbanDictionary, an unreliable source and joke of a dictionary. Unsurprisingly, Google News found nothing and I found what may be an irrelevant or relevant mention with Google News archives here (sixth result from the top). If that article is relevant, it would be insufficient. Google Books found an irrelevant result here. There is nothing to support this article. SwisterTwister talk 21:27, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This is a non-notable student project, just completed last week. No significant references and nothing to show notability. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 04:53, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.