The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:51, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cat Beach Sanctuary[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't see how this is notable Jimfbleak (talk) 08:34, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The kind of local interest story that fills the space of newspapers or attracts clicks but doesn't show evidence of wider notability. Although I've got to admire a person who can turn "crazy cat lady" into a going non-profit. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:37, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Human interest story that doesn't have enduring notability to meet WP:GNG. --Drm310 (talk) 14:06, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:37, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:37, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:37, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No need to say more on this one. MB 02:30, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I remember reading this, got shared on facebook. But yes it is a local human interest story and WP:TOOSOON. Also WP:ORGDEPTH and WP:AUD is not satisfied. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:46, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.