The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Wikipedia does not have a requirement that the article's sources be in English — as long as our article is written in English and the sources are reliable ones, which are both true here, the language of the sources is not relevant to whether the person passes GNG or not. Bearcat (talk) 00:09, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Carlo Giovanardi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It appears the only known sources about this person are not in English, effectively making this person fail WP:GNG. I was unable to find any English language sources to establish the notability guidelines. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 12:31, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:00, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:00, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep, the nomination is clearly invalid. The nominator misunderstood WP:GNG. Reliable sources in any language are clearly acceptable.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:38, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep as per Ymblanter. Furthermore, I've taken a look at a random selection of the references in the article, and they clearly provide coverage sufficient to establish notability. CJK09 (talk) 16:27, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.