- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus here is to Keep but existing sources need to be incoporated into the content of the article. Improvement needed or we might see a return trip to AFD. Liz Read! Talk! 18:55, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Captivating (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article contains no citations and no WP:RS sources that would indicate this work should be part of an encyclopedia. As a work of literature, this does not meet basic criteria for WP:N. Appears to be written as a self-promotional WP:BROCHURE Volcom95 (talk) 17:52, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:15, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep While not as notable as the companion AfD, this book has plenty of coverage such as Christianity Today review, the inflammatorily-named "Let Him Romance You: Rape Culture and Gender Violence in Evangelical Christian Self-Help Literature" here, a First Things review. Our article may need to be seriously improved, but Notability is not in serious question here. Jclemens (talk) 18:40, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Jclemens (talk) 18:41, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per the significant coverage of the book in multiple reliable sources identified above by Jclemens that show a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:29, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Coverage of this has been found. The article needs an expansion but this can be done over time. Archrogue (talk) 20:07, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Wikipedia:Deletion is not cleanup. StAnselm (talk) 14:47, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.