The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 20:40, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Camtek Intelligent Imaging[edit]

Camtek Intelligent Imaging (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems like WP:SOAP to me. Being on the NASDAQ doesn't automatically give you the necessary publicity to pass WP:GNG. Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 22:23, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless better sources founded. Not enough notable sources.Knox490 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:20, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:53, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:53, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:53, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - plenty of sources in Hebrew קמטק ([1]) and in English ([2]) cover Camtek. This has been a public company for a very long time and received significant coverage from the Israeli press (including pre-listing in Israel, as its parent company פריורטק was listed and is essentially the same (mostly holds Camtek) - and some coverage from foreign press. The 3D printing line (which failed and was closed down) received coverage as part of the hype, but coverage extands more than a decade.Icewhiz (talk) 07:08, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Just being listed in not enough, unless its on the NYSE main board or a comparable exchange. At least the English language references are either just notices or PR reports or stock analysts' rating. DGG ( talk ) 00:49, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per plentiful, persuasive sources:

• "Brown Shoe, Camtek: Biggest Price Gainers (BWS, CAMT)" Aug. 26, 2011. "Camtek Ltd. CAMT 2.44% topped the list of Biggest Percentage Price Gainers among common stocks on the Nasdaq Stock Market." WSJ [3].
• " Camtek Receives First Conditional Order for 3D Inkjet System" Feb 2nd, 2015 [4] [[Jewish Business News]
• It is certainly large enough to pay its execs handsomely "100 Israeli execs earned over NIS 3m in 2015" 23 March 2016 Globes [5]
• More coverage in Globes: [6]

• And a raft of coverage in Haaretz, search here: [7] . It suffices.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:10, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. Routine coverage such as comments on its stock price or PR announcements are not sufficient to establish notability. Pointing to Google search results doesn't convince me either. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 14:47, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- nothing encyclopedically relevant here; just a directory listing. An unremarkable private company going about its business; revenues of under $100M are hardly remarkable. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:32, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Most of links I found are results of PR. No independant coverage. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:59, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.