The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:31, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cactoos[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Java-library. Probable self-promotion or undisclosed COI editing. A Google search found no in-depth coverage (but many false positives with other topics). GermanJoe (talk) 07:16, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 07:17, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, a software library that makes no claims of notability. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:43, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:NSOFT.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:07, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.