The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn due to an edit conflict. Another user was restoring the redirects at the same time as I was typing this nomination, so they're all back to redirects again anyway. I'll pursue the request for protecting the redirects through a different channel accordingly. Bearcat (talk) 16:11, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CBPO-FM[edit]

CBPO-FM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Radio stations which are not independently notable per WP:NMEDIA. In a few isolated places, such as provincial or national parks with limited or no conventional radio service, Weatheradio Canada operates transmitters on the conventional AM or FM bands so that campers or tourists don't have to buy special weatheradio receivers -- but (a) these stations are exempt from CRTC licensing as of 2007, meaning that their current operational status is unverifiable, and (b) they do not originate their own standalone programming, but simply repeat programming from a centralized parent service -- and were redirected to Weatheradio Canada accordingly. However, on several occasions now an anonymous IP has arbitrarily reverted my redirects without providing any explanation or engaging in any discussion to suggest why separate articles would be warranted. Accordingly, these need to be either deleted, or converted back to protected redirects to prevent future reversions -- I'd prefer the latter, but as I've been directly involved in the dispute I can't personally impose the latter without consensus. Bearcat (talk) 16:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.