The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:13, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Software article that does not explain its importance, origins, use, or provide any references. Drdisque (talk) 16:15, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong & Speedy Delete I could find no sources. This is either a joke/prank, or something entirely non-notable. It doesn't even seem to have a homepage. Cazort (talk) 17:36, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination; this probably should have been nominated for speedy. — Chromancertalk/cont 18:07, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I did mark it for speedy deletion, but apparently "A7 does not apply to software" according to the Admin who rejected it. -Drdisque (talk) 23:58, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
And he's right, though I've little idea why. Guess you could have prod'ed it, but it'll get done now. — Chromancertalk/cont 00:31, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.