The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per sources provided for notability (which need adding). Black Kite 08:15, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brent Redstone[edit]

Fails WP:BIO. Notability is not inherited. While his siblings have done big things, Brent has not. His parents own big corporations, and his sister does too, but not Brent himself. Delete Undeath (talk) 04:06, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Article makes no mention of what the subject himself has done, if has actually done anything. DarkAudit (talk) 04:09, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BIO,NNewAtThis (talk) 04:25, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User is a banned sock. Jfire (talk) 01:19, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete dosent need his own article, some references in his siblings pages shoul be enough. Fattyjwoods ^{(Push my button)} 05:23, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Fattyjwoods. Unknown User (talk) 08:30, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no assertion of notability other than being related to notables is even attempted. Camillus (talk) 22:13, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep In-depth coverage by CNN [1], The Denver Post [2], The New York Times [3], Variety [4], The Wall Street Journal [5] and many other sources: [6]. Article needs a re-write, not deletion. - Dravecky (talk) 09:27, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep per Dravecky. Lack of sourcing does not equal deletion. Lack of sourcing is an opportunity to improve the article. - Philippe 03:04, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.