The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:32, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brenda Barrios[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a biography of a third-year art transfer student at UCLA, although the article doesn't clearly show that she studies at UCLA, who has no professional accomplishments to speak of, but has received coverage in two student newspapers. Is that sufficient to base a biography on? Note that this article is part of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment by UCLA's Chicanx and Central American Studies' Chicana Art and Artists course. Vexations (talk) 13:10, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Vexations (talk) 13:10, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 13:21, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 13:21, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 13:21, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:10, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not meet WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST criteria. This emerging artist is at the very beginning stages of her career and it's definitely WP:TOOSOON. All a BEFORE search revealed were social media, a kickstarter campaign, Pinterest and other user-submitted content, none of which contributes to notability. I do think it is sad when student work gets deleted, and really wish that the Wiki-educational component might consider advising teachers to assign notable subjects for their students. It seems like it would be a real bummer for a student to work on an article as a class assignment that has no chance of being kept. It seems like that would discourage, rather than encourage editor retention. Netherzone (talk) 15:32, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment that's a problem with the teacher, not the creator of the article. Still nothing notable. Delete. Oaktree b (talk) 23:37, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessarily. Students in WikiEd supported courses should have completed a training module that discusses notability: https://dashboard.wikiedu.org/training/students/wikipedia-essentials/notability-continued Vexations (talk) 15:11, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete student publications covering students are not a source of passing GNG. They lack the full indepdent from the subject we require. This subject is no where near meeting the notability guidelines we have for artists, and we have a clear failure of GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:17, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.