The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus, default to keep. Jayjg ^(talk) 01:03, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bremner Wafer[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails WP:PRODUCT. Mentions in Google News appear tangential. If the company was particularly notable then an article for the company could be created. Ash (talk) 12:05, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:32, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 15:37, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This article appears to be all about the product. The Google News summary of the article says: "The Bremner wafer was born soon after that. and the additional flavors were introduced-just four years ago-because people seemed to want variety. ..." The other articles from the Google News archive mention it in a context that implies that the reader already knows what a Bremner waver is, which implies a kind of notability. -- Eastmain (talk) 18:19, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.
Delete. There is no indication of notability, and it is unlikely that Wikipedia wants or needs articles on every brand of biscuit, cracker, cake, breadstick, et al. Also, ref Ash, the article states the company has been merged, so usually the former company name would be a redirect to the buyer. Sussexonian (talk) 21:34, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. We are not discussing "every brand of biscuit, cracker, cake, breadstick, et al." We are discussing this particular brand, and the evidence strongly suggests that this particular brand has achieved notability. - Eastmain (talk) 04:58, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article clearly establishes the product's notability in the lead. The brand certainly isn't popular, but as is often pointed out popularity != notability.
— V = I * R (talk to Ω) 23:59, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.