The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bratayley[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable--a few really short articles in entertainment magazines do not add up to in-depth discussion in reliable sources. Drmies (talk) 02:04, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Concur - not notable.Orenburg1 (talk) 07:29, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:51, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Drmies has it right. - Sitush (talk) 00:50, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NB: I got fed up of it and have just deleted some of the fancruft - no refs were harmed in the cull. - Sitush (talk) 23:47, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.