The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, withdrawn by nominator. Soxred93 | talk bot 19:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brandworkers international[edit]

Brandworkers international (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Contested prod, reason being "Non-notable organization. Please establish using reliable sources." It sounds like an advertisement, likely to be a copyvio. Soxred93 | talk bot 19:14, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am a first page Wiki-writer and though I have read all the advice and used the sandbox, I'm still having trouble. Please do not remove this article. I believe it is a notable organization for two reasons: 1) It is having real impact on workers' rights 2) It is part of a larger movements of workers rights advocacy groups and immigrant workers rights 3) It has been covered in NYC new sources, which were used and cited in this article.

Problem: I cannot get the page to update itself, it is missing over half the text that appears in the 'editing' page. If you could see the rest of the text you would see that this is a valid wiki entry. Can any one help? 70.23.70.22 (talk) 19:24, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed a ref tag problem on the page, which was hiding ~half the content, including some references. I would ask that you review your comments on this page, to ensure they are still valid. Thanks, Stwalkerster [ talk ] 19:28, 26 February 2008 (UTC) [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.