The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:27, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Boquillas, Arizona[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Evidently a rail spot, judging by its location next to an abandoned SP line. Another searching nightmare due to the Big Boquillas Ranch at the other side of the state, and the Little Boquillas Ranch about five miles SW of this point, but ghosttowns.com admits "Not listed anywhere as being a ghost town. Since it is located so near to abandoned railroad tracks, it must have served the railroad." Not seeing notability here. Mangoe (talk) 21:00, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Arizona. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:35, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't find any indication of notability after searching --Tristario (talk) 22:18, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Probably just a rail stop that served the LBR. Not notable. MB 17:29, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I'd like to hear from page creator User:Onel5969 who usually is quite active in these discussions, but whose opinion we have not heard so far. It appears to be an old railway stop (IMHO in Cochise County this likely means an ore stop, not necessarily any permanent settlement or farm community) but I'm sensitive to keeping any pages which may improve our gazetteer coverage. Common practice in formerly populated places is to keep, but not with the sources I'm seeing so far. BusterD (talk) 19:32, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting after a discussion participant calls for comment from the article creator.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:05, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.