- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:45, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Boneless Children Foundation[edit]
- Boneless Children Foundation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An unsigned and apparently non-notable band. The article, created by Davidsophia (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (same name as a band member) was previously PROD deleted as The Boneless Children Foundation (same content, created by same author). This version was nominated for WP:PROD in 2019, but that was removed with hopes of more references, but none have been forthcoming. The band appears to be unsigned, to have produced only self-published work, to have met with minimal chart success, and to consist of members who aren't themselves notable. Reliable independent coverage appears limited to a few minutes of radio play, some "what's on" local listings, and 3 words in a newspaper blog. I can't find any evidence of further notability or substantial independent coverage, and we've been asking for that for 13 years. So I think this squarely fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG, and should not be in Wikipedia. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 13:26, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I was the PROD-nominator back in 2019 and I've literally been meaning to AfD this ever since. Nominator found the same amount of sources I did back in 2019, best described with the technical term "fuck-all". ♠PMC♠ (talk) 13:35, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. Sources are fairly unimpressive, for the most part. I was able to find one newspaper reference ("Killing My Lobster pop!". The San Francisco Examiner. San Francisco, California. 2004-02-23. p. 11. Retrieved 2022-07-04 – via Newspapers.com.</ref>). A brief mention in the NYT does seem relevant. Overall, it doesn't seem like there is much to work with, but if someone were to WP:HEY the article I would certainly change my mind. jp×g 05:11, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.