The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:43, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Stencil[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreated expired PROD from 2006, hasn't improved since, seems to fail NFICTION/GNG. Ping User:JaneciaTaylor who endorsed the prod before. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:10, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:10, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete @Piotrus: I doubt that you will get a response, as JaneciaTaylor has retired. Meanwhile, Bob Stencil has never been meaningfully discussed by journalists or scholars. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 04:58, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:12, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.